The Rap on Apps: Could They Be Harming Birds?

Edwin Fotheringham

The Rap on Apps: Could They Be Harming Birds?

Overusing apps may be bad for birds.

By Rachel Nuwer
Published: 12/14/2011

Hoot, hoot, hoot! That could be an owl—or just a phone. Tech-savvy birders can have at their fingertips the calls of more than 700 North American species, simply by downloading one of a number of smart-phone apps. Yet if overused, the artificial calls—long employed by ornithologists but now available to the masses—may be harmful to birds by distracting them from activities like feeding and nesting. In fact, they are prohibited in national parks or for attracting endangered species, for example.

The apps don’t tend to come with instructions, which means naïve birders may subscribe to poor playback etiquette. “Some people overuse the apps and drive local birds and other birdwatchers crazy,” says Greg Butcher, Audubon’s director of bird conservation. If a call is overplayed, birds may become overly excited and quickly fly back and forth, says Chris Wood, the project leader of Cornell University’s and Audubon’s eBird, an online database of avian observations. Flitting about wastes the animals’ energy and also means birders might not get a good look at their target species.

When used properly, though, apps can serve as an excellent tool, experts say. John Fitzpatrick, director of Cornell’s Lab of Ornithology, often plays calls to attract birds for educational activities. When one appears, Fitzpatrick calls back a couple of times and then stops. “The bird actually wins that little battle” against the perceived rival, he says. So long as they’re not abused, Wood says, apps create a win–win situation for the bird and the observer. Encouraging a bird to come to you rather than tromping off path is often less damaging to the environment, Butcher adds.

So what is the proper etiquette for app-wielding birders? When in a group, check that others are aware and approve of using the technology, Butcher says, and make sure to limit the playing of the call in any given spot. On public land, find out whether recordings are permitted. “For regular backyard use, there are a lot of upsides,” Fitzpatrick says. “Entertainment, enjoyment, and education—all of which builds passion for bird conservation.”

Magazine Category

Author Profile

Rachel Nuwer

Type: Author | From: Audubon Magazine

Comments

Bird Apps

Common sense and perhaps a small paragraph in the information section should deal with any problems caused by using recorded sounds to attract or deter certain birds. Most birds are capable of distinguishing between a mobile pone app and real song. The Bird Apps (Audobon especially) will have a hugely positive result I am sure as it makes it easier to engage with wildlife for users and generates a positive attitude.

Experts weigh in on burrowing owl comment

Hello, Cape Owls,

The author of this story, Rachel Nuwer, saw your comment and has this to say: "[This story] raises a larger point: good birding ethics are a necessity not just for fellow birders, but also for the animals themselves. 'We as a community need to be aware of our actions,' says Chris Wood, an ornithologist at Cornell University and the project leader for Cornell and Audubon’s eBird (http://ebird.org/content/ebird/about). When visiting a birding location alongside dozens of others, collective actions add up in ways they wouldn’t with only a single visitor, he warns. It’s important to keep in mind not only the actions of other birders, but also the specifics of the situation or individual animal at hand. In this case, the burrowing owl in question was far out of its normal range, placing it in a highly vulnerable position, says John Fitzpatrick, the director of Cornell’s Lab of Ornithology. In unfamiliar ground, the bird faces confusing terrain and potentially encounters new predators, he says, and is likely already stressed. 'The fact that it was dispatched by a Cooper’s hawk would certainly be a natural fate for many such vagrants,' Fitzpatrick points out.

"This does not excuse the birders’ actions, however. 'If birders really did play an active role in purposefully moving this bird out of hiding, then they obviously were greatly—and knowingly—increasing its vulnerability,' Fitzpatrick says.

"Bottom line: in situations where the bird is rare, out of its element or in an area frequented by many other birders, audio devices are better left at home."

The demise of a Burrowing Owl

Recently, a vagrant Burrowing Owl was spotted in the Chicago area. Birders and photographers "flocked" to the area to see the unusual visitor. The owl was repeatedly flushed out into open in order to get a better look. To the horror of the onlookers, a Coopers Hawk, one of the Burrowing Owls biggest predators, made a quick meal of the bird. Was the Burrowing Owl's death due to inappropriate use of audio devices, or inappropriate behavior of the onlookers, or was the Burrowing Owl eaten because it was eaten because it was battered by the recent bad weather and easy prey for the hawk? No one will know for sure, but it does give us a wake up call fr all of us to practice good birding ethics. Audio devices can be of great value, but like most things, they should be used in moderation if at all.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.