Saddle Sores

Matt Slaby

Saddle Sores

Feral horses are out of control in the American West, laying waste to vast tracts of wildlife habitat and imperiling native species. What’s worse, the public seems determined to keep it that way.

By Ted Williams
Published: January-February 2011

The blizzard I’d driven through 18 hours earlier had left southwestern Wyoming shrouded in fog, grounding the two helicopters that would herd “wild horses” into the mouth of a big funnel trap of rock outcroppings, cloth fences, and metal gates fashioned by the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) contractor, Cattoor Livestock Roundup Inc. At noon I could see the sun’s outline, and 15 minutes later the high desert was clear, revealing its adobe-colored rock strata and gray, brown, and purple canyons, buttes, and mesas that stretched 40 miles to a cloud bank still hanging over Colorado.

In the sunlight and freshening wind the habitat’s fragility became more apparent. I hiked across badlands of shale and polished stones, over sparse shrubs, thin, widely spaced clumps of grasses and forbs, and dry dirt that crumbled and sailed aloft. Ancient, scraggly junipers dotted the hills. Pronghorns and mule deer browsed the valleys. Less than seven inches of precipitation a year isn’t unusual here, and that precipitation may come in two rainstorms, so it doesn’t do much good. A week earlier nearby Sandy Creek had been a raging torrent. On this day it was cracked mud.

A helicopter appeared on the southern horizon—a black speck, rising and falling like a hoverfly. An hour later I saw dust rising from the first band of horses. Finally, white and black ears and manes topped a sage-lined ridge. The BLM’s controversial October 2010 roundup, or “gather,” as it prefers, was under way on its 1,618,624-acre Adobe Town-Salt Wells horse management complex.

 

The Obama administration has dared to tell the truth about feral horses. In October 2009 Interior Secretary Ken Salazar announced that horses were “out of control” and creating a “huge problem.” In what came to be called the Salazar Initiative, he proposed aggressive action, including, but not limited to, transplanting horses to large preserves in the Midwest and East. But when Salazar floated the idea at a June 14, 2010, public meeting in Denver, he got eaten alive by literally hundreds of feral-horse groups, which called his proposed reserves “Salazoos.” Save for a few non-controversial, ineffective, and ongoing strategies like skewing sex ratios by releasing more stallions, he abandoned his initiative.

Because horses are the only ungulates in North America with solid hooves and meshing teeth, they are particularly destructive of native vegetation. Audubon Wyoming director and Rocky Mountain regional vice president Brian Rutledge worries especially about sage grouse and the whole sagebrush ecosystem. “Sage grouse [endangered in fact if not by official decree] fed the eastward movement of the Native Americans and the westward movement of European Americans,” he says. “Now we expect them to tolerate our fragmentation of their ecosystem and the decimation of its plant life by a feral domestic animal. Sadly, we have become a culture that longs to make its decisions without information.”

A feral horse is a far greater threat to native ecosystems than a cow. When grass between shrubs is gone cows move on; horses stomp the shrubs into the dirt to get the last blade. What’s more, when cattle deplete forage they’re moved to new allotments, and they’re taken off the range in winter. But horses pound vegetation all year. And because horses live on range incapable of consistently sustaining them they sometimes starve and, in the process, cause the starvation of such sensitive desert creatures as sage grouse, bighorn sheep, Gila monsters, pronghorns, and desert tortoises. Not only will horses beat springs and seeps into mud holes, they’ll stand over them, running off wild ungulates, people, and even sage grouse.

The feral-horse lobby dismisses these facts as fiction concocted by the BLM on behalf of the cattle industry. For example, Ginger Kathrens, founder and director of the Cloud Foundation (which takes its name from a feral horse she calls Cloud), contends that the BLM is purposefully concealing the reality that feral horses are good for what ails the earth. “We call them ‘the green horses’ because they have so many benefits to the land,” she told Friends of Animals, which, along with her foundation, sponsored a “March for Mustangs” in Washington, D.C., last March 25.

The BLM won’t let horse numbers on the Adobe Town-Salt Wells complex get much lower than its bottom-line AML (appropriate management level) of 861. It does, however, let numbers get much higher—the population had ballooned to about 2,500. AMLs are created with a little data and a lot of guesswork. They’re supposed to take into consideration the needs of wildlife, yet in lots of cases the BLM has no way of knowing what those needs are, as I discovered when BLM supervisory range management specialist Andy Warren led me on an inspection of Adobe Town habitat. Warren pointed out lots of less nutritious forage like saltgrass and wheatgrass. Horses, cattle, sheep, and wildlife will eat it, but they prefer grasses like basin wildrye, Indian ricegrass, needle and thread, and bottlebush squirreltail—species fading from the scene at least in part because of overgrazing by horses and livestock.

Magazine Category

Author Profile

Ted Williams

Ted Williams is freelance writer.

Type: Author | From: Audubon Magazine

Comments

Xorauguynabzfez

triallystamma xaikalitag Neurasqueet http://usillumaror.com - iziananatt HerEsselt http://gussannghor.com LentyMone

if you care about animals do

if you care about animals do not exaggerate a problem in order to get support. be honest and realistic and fair to all concerned. thanks. 70-331 || 70-332 || 70-412 || 70-413 || 70-414 || 70-462 || 70-498 || 70-511CSHARP || 70-519 || 70-519CSHARP

We need more such post

Great Post. I have not been visiting the site recently. Took a visit again and there were some great comments on the site. Excellent post. Keep up the good work.
Belgravia Villas

Anyone who has actually lived

Anyone who has actually lived with wild horses knows how TRUE this article is. I own 15 acres in Northern Nevada and am surrounded by the glaring evidence of damage horses do to the ecosystem. We have plenty of what my newsroom called "horse crazies," who pressure local and federal officals to protect this invasive alien. But they have never come upon a horse, lured into a neighborhood by idiots ILLEGALLY feeding them, dying in a median--or someone being Careflighted out after his vehicle smashed into a horse. We had a mortally injured horse, lured into the path of a car, wandering in our neighborhood for 4 days before it died. I have called the Ag Dept on people feeding horses in suburban neighborhoods, unwittingly endangering the animals AND residents. Oh, and as for the argument, "They've always been here," there is a REASON horses died out in the New World. Why not also bring back mastodons and saber-toothed tigers? In the millions of years sonce the orginal N. American horses died out, an entirely new ecosystem has evolved--one in which horses have no part. Let this "vanishing part of the Old West" (which breed like flies)die out--or get sent to the slaughterhouses!

You've got to be kidding.

The North American horse died out only 11 thousand years ago, several thousand years after humans arrived. The horse evolved right here in North America over a 50 million year period and did just fine through a huge range of climatic changes until humans with a late stone age tool kit showed up and slaughtered them all for food.

If you ever get a chance to visit the La Brea tarpits, you'll learn what every school kid in Southern California already knows.

this artice is crap

Gosh Ted. You sound so much like The Voice of Reason and make the wild horse advocates sound like shrieking idiots. Good Job. Only thing is, you are wrong and there are so many people in the world now who know factually what is true that you ended up making yourself look - um. Let's just say...misinformed. What is happening REALLY - and we (wild horse advocates) are going to find this out - is that this land that was allocated to the wild horses is wanted for other things by people who want to be free to destroy our (allocated to the horses) western lands without any uncomfortable attention from anyone. The horses are: a) being used as a distraction for what these people don't want to be seen or: b) necessary to eradicate so wild horse advocates find something else to do and these people are left to do what they want to do in private. YOUR "wildlife," that you seem to think is being threatened by the mustang, will die right along with the horses eventually...all of it. Congrats Ted on your very wrong conclusions. And, hey, sleep well.

Oh yeah! One more thing!

And another thing, you call that disgusting picture of a helicopter chasing down horses "a gather"? I know a great idea! You go out in the desert and let a helicopter chase you for miles and see if you still think of it as "a gather". Don't try to down play with little soothing words what is done to these beautiful creatures. Call it for what it is! A greedy round up in the scorching heat that lasts for miles, where horses are hurt and legs are broken and they are run until they are exhausted. An allover swoop that traumatizes them.
Then you get some gopher to write an article for you that shows your ignorance, though you thought you would get one over on us because you thought we were the ignorant ones, and all along, you are working for the cattle industry and the government and any other person with money in their pockets! Do you get my point? You never fooled anyone with your little caption, "a gather". My opinion of the "World Audubon Society" has gone down to levels that are below the meter line.

Will no longer support the Audubon

I will no longer support the Audubon because this article clearly shows that they are sadly misinformed. Wild horses are part of the ecosystem and in nature God has made each animal play an important part. So for your ignorance you no longer have my support.

The wild horses ARE part of

The wild horses ARE part of the ecosystem!

cattle and horses

To argue cow vs horse is to miss the important point that BOTH are detrimental. We should work to remove both. I have nothing against the cattle industry, but they should carry their own weight; buy land and keep their for-profit hooves on that land that they own. Perhaps then they will have more respect for the land than they do when the raise their cash crop on land that *I* own. As for horses being "native" they died out on their own. For a reason. Before human interaction. To say they are "reintroduced" is to try to equate them to some endangered species that conservationists have worked hard to bring back as an integral part of an ecosystem. But the ecosystem of which they were a part tens of thousands of years ago does not exist. Whales have been found in Wyoming - should we "reintroduce" those, as well?

BLM is little more than a government handout to businesses, large and small. It is logical that we start by kicking out the largest first, and work to eventually kick out the small ones, too. Then we can all be proud of saving that land for future generations.

And while we're at it, let's get the hooves off barrier islands, too. They cause even more damage there.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.